Thursday, March 26, 2009

Russia Returns to Red Armband Peoples Patrols



International Herald Tribune
In Russia, a nostalgic return to public patrols
Tuesday, March 24, 2009

MOSCOW: Moscow's typically traffic-clogged central thoroughfare was jammed this day with people, basking in a rare late-winter sun as a fire department marching band in lime-green uniforms and shiny gold helmets warmed up for a spring festival parade.

As the band prepared to march, Vladimir K. Kazerzin moved in with his men to help clear a path through the crowd. Mr. Kazerzin is a former philosophy teacher, not a police officer, and that is the point. He heads a contingent of volunteer police officers, called druzhiniki, who patrol with increasing frequency in the capital alongside the professionals to bolster their ranks and, at times, counter their belligerence.

"Look at that sad looking soldier in comparison with my guys," Mr. Kazerzin said with a glimmer of pride, pointing out a particularly morose conscript soldier working crowd control along with his volunteers. Nearby, Moscow police officers barked aggressively under their big fur hats at the crowd to clear out, prompting snarls of indignation.

Meanwhile, Mr. Kazerzin's men, mostly college students in red armbands and with piercings glittering in their ears, smiled and chatted with passersby, while directing them to spots where they could watch the parade without getting in the way.

For those who recall life in the Soviet Union, the druzhiniki are often a nostalgic reminder of the citizen patrols of students and grandmothers walking the streets in red armbands at the behest of the Communist Party to keep a lookout for hooligans and petty criminals.

Though their numbers have dwindled since the Soviet collapse, the government is working to revive the druzhiniki in part to help law enforcement agencies combat what officials fear will be a spike in crime and public disorder amid the growing unemployment and rising prices of the economic crisis. A group of lawmakers in the Russian Parliament is pushing legislation that could enhance the authority of existing volunteer patrols.

Today, these volunteer groups appear little different from the civilian neighborhood watch organizations found in many countries. But in Russia they offer a rare example of volunteerism in a society that remains largely skeptical of civic groups after years of forced social activism under the Soviets, and fears of a return to the days of civilian informers.

But the groups' proponents dismiss such fears. "When it comes to protecting children and driving teenaged hooligans from the playground, people will come together," said Vasily I. Solmin, a former submariner in the Pacific Fleet, who now heads a group of druzhiniki in Moscow.

Druzhiniki all but disappeared after the Russian government withdrew its support with the collapse of the Soviet Union, but re-emerged in force in Moscow following terrorist attacks on two apartment buildings that killed hundreds in 1999, said Irina Svyatenko, a member of the Moscow city legislature.

"At that time, people just decided to start patrolling their neighborhoods," she said. "They did not ask anyone for permission, and there was no government initiative. People just decided that this was needed."

There are now as many as 17,000 volunteers in Moscow and units in more than 40 other regions of Russia, said Vyacheslav I. Khalamov, an assistant to the chief of the Moscow druzhiniki. In the capital, volunteers help the police with crowd control at major public events like concerts, sporting events, public festivals and protests.

A favorite among the druzhiniki is working the annual Fourth of July reception put on by the U.S. Embassy here. "They even feed us and sometimes give us a bottle of beer," Mr. Kazerzin said.

In Soviet days, he said, they could detain people on misdemeanor charges and write traffic tickets and were compensated if injured while on patrol. For the most part, the current druzhiniki get little outside of free public transport and the red armband.

"We should be working on those issues that the police simply don't have time for, like small street crimes and crime prevention," Mr. Khalamov said.

The new legislation, which will likely come up for hearings in Parliament in coming months, would institute the druzhiniki on a federal level and allow them to impose fines for failure to obey their orders and provide compensation for injuries suffered while on patrol. Legislators have even debated the possibility of allowing the volunteers to carry weapons like batons or stun guns.

"We are now giving society a chance through this structure to fight against crime, help protect public order and, most importantly, to guarantee security in one's own backyard," said Vladimir A. Vasilyev, the head of the Security Committee in Parliament.

Critics, however, worry that this emboldened civilian police force could easily succumb to the substantial corruption that already pervades law enforcement agencies in Russia.

"If today we already have problems controlling our police, what happens when we create a far less trained, less disciplined and less controlled structure?" said Aleksandr Cherkasov, from the Moscow-based human rights organization Memorial.

Not so, said Valery I. Maximov, a retired police officer who now commands a 126-member regiment of volunteers in Moscow. He argues that since the volunteers are required to patrol with the police their presence can actually dissuade officers from yielding to corruption.

"When they patrol along with police," he said, "I know that the officer will not take a bribe because the druzhinik is watching."

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

China Assuages The Internet, Blocks YouTube

"Unafraid" China apparently fears YouTube
Source: Reuters
Tue Mar 24, 2009 4:26pm EDT


Photo
BEIJING (Reuters) - China is not afraid of the Internet, its Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday, even as access to the popular video sharing site YouTube was apparently blocked.

YouTube, owned by search giant Google Inc, has been unavailable for users in China, which filters the Internet for content critical of the Communist Party, since late on Monday.

"Many people have a false impression that the Chinese government fears the Internet. In fact it is just the opposite," Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang told reporters.

He said he did not know about YouTube being blocked.

A Google spokesman confirmed that access to the video site has been blocked in China over the past 24 hours.

"YouTube is currently blocked in China. We don't know the reason for the blockage, but are working as quickly as possible to restore access to our users in China," said spokesman Scott Rubin.

Rubin would not comment on whether YouTube has contacted the Chinese authorities to confirm it has officially been blocked or if it is a technical problem.

Both Google and YouTube have previously been blocked in China for brief periods, according to the company. In the past Chinese authorities have blocked specific videos.

Access to YouTube had been spotty earlier in March, the one-year anniversary of widespread protests by Tibetans against Chinese rule.

Qin said China's 300 million Internet users and 100 million blogs showed "China's Internet is open enough, but also needs to be regulated by law in order to prevent the spread of harmful information and for national security."

An Internet crackdown that began in January has closed hundreds of Chinese sites, including a popular blog hosting site and several sites popular with Tibetans.

It has been described by analysts as another step in the Party's battle to stifle dissent in a year of sensitive anniversaries, including the 20th anniversary of the government's bloody crackdown on the pro-democracy Tiananmen Square protests in 1989.

YouTube, which has country-specific sites in 23 countries, has in the past been blocked in certain countries, including Turkey and Thailand in disputes over specific videos.


Direct Link to Article:

http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE52N1VN20090324

Monday, March 23, 2009

Another Trillion Dollars Sinks Us to $11 Trillion in Bailouts!

NWOblogger.com Original Article

In another brazen move by the Wall Street Bankers using their strong arm in the Treasury Department, a plan has been approved to purchase ONE TRILLION DOLLARS or more of toxic bank assets. The proposed plan includes the proviso that the monies offered be used for mortgages OR for the buyout of consequential securities otherwise known as "toxic derivatives".

The plan will offer investors the opportunity to purchase margin assets at approximately 5% of their reduced value with the Government (in actuality We the People) taking on the remaining 95% of debt and risk. These "loans" will be guaranteed against "any losses", presumably this means that any margin below the original 5% investment will be reimbursed to the investor.


The proposal sounds quite lucrative to investors, but what does it mean for the economy and the stock markets?

A likely result of this new trillion dollar policy will be an even larger derivatives bubble. Investors may clamor to wedge themselves into these enticing margin loan positions, stacking their clams, and waiting for the deluge to wash over the markets revealing the New World Financial Order.

As investors wait for these margin investments to ripen into profits, side-betting opportunists will invariably try to add their own higher and more unstable layers to an already teetering house of cards with securities and derivatives based on the margin investments.

One thing is for sure, the American Peoples' clams lean on the house of cards with delicate precision and the derivatives are like a tornado wind destined to lay ruin to all.

HOW IT WILL WORK IN PRACTICE
- Bank seeks to sell pool of mortgages worth $100
- Private auction decides that asset is now worth $84
- Private investor and government put up $6 each
- They then borrow remaining $72 from government
- That loan is guaranteed against any losses
- If asset is later sold at higher price, government makes profit and private investor pays back loan and pockets profit.
- If asset is sold at lower price, government and private investors could lose initial investment.
Source: US Treasury
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7958501.stm

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Obama's Cabinet Yields Nothing But Rancid Nuts and Rotten Fruits

Obama CIO a Confessed Petty Thief



Blogosphere surfaces 12-year-old guilty plea

America's first CIO once pleaded guilty to a petty theft charge, according to Maryland state records.

Vivek Kundra is currently on leave (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/13/vivek_leave/) from his federal CIO post, after one of his former employees was arrested for alleged IT bribery.

Kundra was tapped for the newly formed CIO position on March 5, after almost two years as chief technology officer for the local Washington, D.C. government.

Just seven days after the appointment, a manager in the D.C. CTO office was arrested on charges of bribery, conspiracy, money laundering, and conflict of interest. Forty-year-old Yusuf Acar is suspected of soliciting and accepting bribes in exchange for IT contracts.

Following the arrest, the White House said that Kundra had been put on leave - though federal authorities have told several news sources that he is not part of the investigation into Acar's behavior. According to the White House, he is on leave due to "an abundance of caution."

Now, the blogosphere has turned up Maryland state records showing that Kundra pleaded guilty to a sub-$300 theft charge in 1997. The arrest was first noticed by the Hot Air Blog (http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/16/kundras-record/) and was soon trumpeted by Valleywag (http://valleywag.gawker.com/5171500/barack-obamas-cio-a-confessed-thief) and, yes, Fox News (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/17/white-house-information-officer-committed-petty-theft-years-ago/).

The White House has yet to respond to our request for comment. Gary Segal, the lawyer who represented Kundra after his 1997 arrest, responded only to say "I'm sorry but there is nothing I can say about this matter."

After pleading guilty to petty theft, Kundra received "supervised probation" for less than a month and a fine of $500. $400 of that was suspended. ®

ABC News Mocks "Conspiracy Theorists", Acknowledges Elite Organization

Conspiracy Theorists Scrutinize Obama Ties

The highest levels of the Obama administration are infested with members of a shadowy, elitist cabal intent on installing a one-world government that subverts the will of the American people.

It sounds crazy, but that’s what a group of very persistent conspiracy theorists insists, and they point to President Obama’s nominee for Health and Human Services Secretary, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, as the latest piece of evidence supporting their claims.

It turns out that Sebelius - like top administration economists Timothy Geithner, Larry Summers and Paul Volcker, as well as leading Obama diplomats Richard Holbrooke and Dennis Ross - is a Bilderberger. That is, she is someone who has participated in the annual invitation-only conference held by an elite international organization known as the Bilderberg group.

The group, which takes its name from the Dutch hotel where it held its first meeting in 1954, exists solely to bring together between 100 and 150 titans of politics, finance, military, industry, academia and media from North America and Western Europe once a year to discuss world affairs. It doesn’t issue policy statements or resolutions, nor does it hold any events other than an annual meeting.

Past participants have included Margaret Thatcher, who attended the 1975 meeting at Turkey’s Golden Dolphin Hotel, former media mogul Conrad Black, who has been to more than a dozen conferences, and Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, King Juan Carlos of Spain and top officials of BP, IBM, Barclays and the Bank of England.

It is precisely that exclusive roster of globally influential figures that has captured the interest of an international network of conspiracists, who for decades have viewed the Bilderberg conference as a devious corporate-globalist scheme.




The fulminating is aggravated by Obama's preference for surrounding himself with well-credentialed, well-connected, and well-traveled elites. His personnel choices have touched a populist, even paranoid nerve among those who are convinced powerful elites and secret societies are moving the planet toward a new world order.

Their worldview, characterized by a deep and angry suspicion of the ruling class rather than any prevailing partisan or ideological affiliation, is widely articulated on overnight AM radio shows and a collection of Internet websites.

The video sharing website YouTube alone is home to thousands of Bilderberg-related videos.

“I don’t laugh at the people who claim that they understand the connections, but I’ve never really spent much time tracing that through,” said Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), a former presidential candidate whose libertarian sensibilities have made him a darling of the Bilderberg conspiracists.

“The one thing that concerns me is that the people who surround Obama or Bush generally come from the same philosophic viewpoint and they have their organizations - they have the Trilateral Commission, the CFR [Council on Foreign Relations] and the Bilderbergers, and they’ve been around a long time. And my biggest concern is what they preach: Keynesian economics and interventionism and world planning,” he said.

While it's easy to dismiss the Bilder-busters as cranks, these voices have a way of making themselves heard on the margins of the debate in ways that can prove to be a real, if minor, distraction to Obama’s political team. Bill Clinton had trouble shaking rumors that he was behind a shady criminal syndicate operating out of the Mena airport. George W. Bush was sometimes portrayed as the puppet of clandestine Middle Eastern oil interests.

Obama’s selection of numerous Bilderbergers for key posts “certainly would verify their suspicions,” said Paul, referring to fears of the group’s influence.

“And I don’t think it’s just Obama. Whether t’s the Republicans or the Democrats - Goldman Sachs generally has somebody in treasury. And the big banks generally have somebody in the Federal Reserve. And they’re international people, too. And they’re probably working very hard this weekend, with the G20. And they get involved in the IMF. But that is their stated goal. They do believe in a powerful centralized government and we believe in the opposite.”

One popular website, “Prison Planet,” greeted Sebelius’ nomination with the headline “Obama Picks Bilderberger for Health Secretary.”

It’s obvious why Bilderberg is a frequent target of conspiracy theorists, who’ve credited it with anointing aspiring presidents, selecting their running mates, creating the European Union and instigating the war in Iraq and the bombing of Serbia, among other coups.

Bilderberg meetings are closed to the press, participants are asked not to publicly discuss the proceedings and the attendee list is only occasionally released. As a result, the group has come to be viewed as a more publicity-shy cousin to the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations - other influential international think tanks that are staples of fringe group conversation.

Unlike Bilderberg, though, those organizations have opened their proceedings to public scrutiny, maintain websites and have long listed their members.

The Bilderberg group, in a rare press release last year, laid out a benign if vague mission: creating “a better understanding of the complex forces and major trends affecting Western nations.”

“Bilderberg is a small, flexible, informal and off-the-record international forum in which different viewpoints can be expressed and mutual understanding enhanced,” read the press release, which noted that a list of participants would be available by phone request between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM on the second and third days of the conference.

The Bilderberg conspiracists first pounced on the Obama connection during the 2008 campaign, when news leaked in May that the candidate, who at the time was closing in on the Democratic presidential nomination, had initially tapped former Fannie Mae chairman Jim Johnson, a top Bilderberger, to help him select a running mate.

IRS filings show that Johnson as recently as 2006 was the treasurer of a non-profit group called American Friends of Bilderberg. The group has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years to pay for meetings--including $125,000 in total contributions from Bilderberg stalwarts Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller in 2005 and 2006 plus $25,000 in 2005 from the Washington Post, whose chairman Don Graham has attended in the past.

Johnson did not return a message inquiring about his role at Bilderberg.

“The news further puts to rest any delusions that Bilderberg is a mere talking shop where no decisions are made,” reported Prison Planet. “It also ridicules once again any notion that an Obama presidency would bring ‘change’ to the status quo of America being ruled by an unelected corporate and military-industrial complex elite.”

One month later, in June, Johnson was joined at the 2008 Bilderberg meeting by Geithner, Holbrooke, Summers and Ross, as well as Obama’s first choice for HHS secretary, Tom Daschle, and Sebelius, who at the time was included on some short lists of prospective Obama running mates and who also attended the 2007 meeting in Istanbul, Turkey.

According to the Bilderberg press release, the meeting was designed to “deal mainly with a nuclear free world, cyber terrorism, Africa, Russia, finance, protectionism, US-EU relations, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Islam and Iran.” Approximately two-thirds of the 140 expected attendees came from Europe, according to the release, and the rest from North America.

Had the meeting been held outsie the United States, that might have been the end of the Obama angle. But the conference, which took place from June 5 through 8, was held at a heavily guarded hotel in Chantilly, Va. in suburban Washington-coincidentally overlapping with an Obama campaign event in the area.

While Obama’s schedule indicated he was to fly home to Chicago for the weekend-and journalists were herded on a campaign plane under the impression they were headed there along with Obama-the future president slipped away for a private meetings and never actually boarded the flight. As it turned out, Obama secretly met that evening with Hillary Rodham Clinton in Washington, D.C., but not before raising alarms among the Bilder-busters, who were convinced something was rotten in Chantilly.

Prison Planet connected the dots and concluded Obama and Clinton met at the Bilderberg meeting, declaring that “the complete failure of the mainstream media to report on the fact, once again betrays the super-secretive nature and influential reputation that the 54-year-old organization still maintains.”

“It is now seems increasingly likely that the secret meetings with Bilderberg this weekend will herald the decision to name Hillary Clinton as Obama's VP candidate,” predicted a sister site, Infowars.net.

Even the snarky D.C.-based Wonkette blog weighed in, half-seriously positing that “really, it sounds like” Obama and Clinton rendezvoused “at that creepy Bilderberg Group meeting, which is happening now, and which is so secret that nobody will admit they’re going, even though everybody who is anybody goes to Bilderberg.”

Curiously, though, the episode wasn’t the first time a Bilderberg meeting intersected with vice presidential selection machinations.

In 2004, both Time magazine and the New York Times noted that then-Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C) had impressed Bilderbergers at that year’s conference in Stresa, Italy-roughly one month prior to his selection as Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) running mate-- when Edwards debated Republican Ralph Reed. Then, as in 2008, Jim Johnson led the vice presidential vetting.

Time reported that then-Sen. Jon Corzine (D-N.J.) and Holbrooke attended and called Kerry “with rave reviews” about Edwards' debate skills.

In its tick-tock of the vice-presidential selection process, the New York Times also noted the Bilderberg effect.

"His performance at Bilderberg was important," a friend of Kerry told the Times. "He reported back directly to Kerry. There were other reports on his performance. Whether they reported directly or indirectly, I have no doubt the word got back to Mr. Kerry about how well he did."

An attendee of the 2004 meeting dismissed the notion that Edwards’ Bilderberg performance helped land him on the Democratic ticket.

“It wasn’t because of his performance at the meeting - he was at the meeting because he was going to get picked” said the attendee, who did not want to be identified breaching Bilderberg’s off-the-record rule. “He was there as a surrogate for Kerry” and to boost his foreign policy bona fides, said the attendee.

Either way, the attendee contended, the Bilderberg conspiracy theories don’t make sense on their face, if only because the wide array of ideologies represented would make it difficult to reach consensus.

“There were so many different people there with so many different viewpoints that it belied the opportunity to really conspire, because obviously a Kissinger and a [prominent neoconservative Richard] Perle are going to come down in a very different place than say a Holbrooke or a Johnson,” the attendee said.

Besides, the attendee observed, it’s almost impossible to name a Bilderberger-free Cabinet.

“You’d be hard pressed to find an administration that hasn’t reahed into those ranks into the last 20, 30, 40 years."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/15/politics/politico/main4866504.shtml

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Southeast Asian Union In Near Future?

International Herald Tribune

International Herald Tribune
Southeast Asian Nations talk of economic union

Bloomberg News
Monday, March 2, 2009

Southeast Asian governments want to speed up the formation of an economic group modeled on the European Union as the global recession slows their export-driven economies.

Leaders from the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations gathered in Thailand over the weekend for their annual meeting, and signed trade deals and agreements to form an integrated economic community, without a common currency, by 2015.

But analysts said that absent from the agenda were the concessions they said were necessary to increase growth in the region.

"Asean's biggest problem is that individual members haven't been willing to sacrifice for the common good," said Michael Montesano, a visiting research fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore. "Every European Union member has given up sovereignty to be part of a stronger union, and we haven't seen that in Asean."

Wide economic disparity among Asean members has hindered the region's ability to leverage its market of 570 million people and compete for investments with China and India, the world's fastest growing economies. Thailand's prime minister, Abhisit Vejjajiva, who led the meeting, called on the bloc to "accelerate" the formation of an "attractive single market."



Southeast Asian leaders agree that closer regional integration would help growth, Thailand's finance minister, Korn Chatikavanij, said in an interview. Still, the large differences in wealth among Asean members make it "difficult to create common standards because our national standards remain so far apart," he said.

The push for more integration comes at a time when the European Union is straining under the pressures created by a similar disparity in the strength of its constituent economies.

Multinational companies have scaled back spending because of the global recession, leading to fiercer competition among governments looking to attract investment and create jobs.

China Recovering, Premier Says

China's economy has shown some signs of recovery after the government put into place its 4 trillion yuan ($585 billion) economic stimulus package, Premier Wen Jiabao said.

"The government's measures to tackle the financial crisis have shown preliminary results," Wen said during an online chat with the public on the government's Web site on Sunday. He cited rising loans, retail sales in January and growing power output and consumption since the middle of February.

China's economy, the world's third largest after those of the United States and Japan, expanded 6.8 percent in the fourth quarter, the slowest in seven years.

China's consumer spending jumped 18 percent in January, bank loans surged and power output and consumption regained growth since the middle of February, Wen said.

Still, he cautioned that the positive data might be temporary.